Discussion:
SMS or DMS
(too old to reply)
netzorro
2008-01-01 18:44:00 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,
without considering DMS in a device, normally, the simplest choices are SMS
or DMS in files.
Is there any performance improvement using a DMS tablepsace container in a
file instead of a SMS ?

Also, if a SMS tablespace container is used, does it make sense to
reorganize the tables?

Thanks
Diego
Blair Kenneth Adamache
2008-01-02 19:16:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by netzorro
Hi all,
without considering DMS in a device, normally, the simplest choices are SMS
or DMS in files.
Is there any performance improvement using a DMS tablepsace container in a
file instead of a SMS ?
Not really, excepts for the catalogs, and to allow lobs to be cached in
filesystem memory. Generally, I would recommend automated storage with
DB2 in DMS files.
Post by netzorro
Also, if a SMS tablespace container is used, does it make sense to
reorganize the tables?
Yes, if reorgchk says to do this.
Post by netzorro
Thanks
Diego
Knut Stolze
2008-01-03 11:14:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by netzorro
Hi all,
without considering DMS in a device, normally, the simplest choices are
SMS or DMS in files.
Is there any performance improvement using a DMS tablepsace container in a
file instead of a SMS ?
SMS grows and shrinks on demand while DMS uses pre-allocated files. The
growing of SMS containers may have a slight impact on performance. But I
doubt this will have a measurable impact on real-world applications.
--
Knut Stolze
DB2 z/OS Utilities Development
IBM Germany
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...